<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OpenCouchSurfing.org &#187; traditional_hospitality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/tag/traditional_hospitality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org</link>
	<description>The campaign for a truly open CouchSurfing organisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>German article about Hospitality 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/17/hospitality-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/17/hospitality-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>midsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business_models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[couchsurfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell_out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telepolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional_hospitality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/17/hospitality-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For your interest: There is an arcticle about Couchsurfing in a German online magazin called Telepolis under the headline &#8220;Gastfreundschaft 2.0&#8221; (= &#8220;Hospitality 2.0&#8243; &#8211; german only). I&#8217;ll try to summarize/translate some main points here. The article&#8217;s intention is more or less critical in a non-conventional way. So maybe there is something to learn out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For your interest: There is an arcticle about Couchsurfing in a German online magazin called Telepolis under the headline &#8220;<a href="http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/25/25893/1.html" title="Gastfreundschaft 2.0">Gastfreundschaft 2.0</a>&#8221; (= &#8220;Hospitality 2.0&#8243; &#8211; german only). I&#8217;ll try to summarize/translate some main points here. The article&#8217;s intention is more or less critical in a non-conventional way. So maybe there is something to learn out of it.</p>
<p>The author quotes the still not changed CS-Mission &#8220;Creating a better world&#8221; and starts with the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Is CS a globalization from the bottom, realising a cometogether of people solidly united from all over the world far beyond the leadership of profits?</li>
<li>Or is this all leading to a point where 270.000 people under the Couchsurfing logo will wake up with a hangover and have to realize that the party is over and they&#8217;re trained to be clients of another World Commerce Corporation?</li>
</ul>
<p>After a general description of couchsurfing with some examples the author raises concerns, that a network like this is not spreading the idea of hospitality at all. On the one hand side the <a href="http://www.couchsurfing.com/group.html?gid=6051">sophisticated criterias for searching</a> and detailled profiles will bring only similar people to meet with eachother, excluding different people as a potential risk or at least <em>too</em> different. On the other hand side the networks could kill traditional hospitality, by replacing it with a technical solution or even worse simply with business models.</p>
<p>The author calls the <a href="http://www.couchsurfing.com/terms.html">CS Terms of Use</a> a  loud ticking bomb for everyone who is not deafening hisself because of enthusiasm about the idea. He recommend reading it and says he hasn&#8217;t read very often texts repeating in every thinkable detail the same thing: &#8220;We (the company) are allowed to do everything, you (the users) are not allowed to anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>A last quote (in bad translation):</p>
<p>&#8220;The thought, who obtrude the fan, the idea for this creepy conditions don&#8217;t suit the idea or the spirit of the community and are not invented from the founder of the CS-project, but from some mean consultants who talked him into it, should not calm down anyone: Very soon this kind of consultants will force him on selling to the highest bid. I for one haven&#8217;t found anything in the conditions, that would make such a buy-out difficult.&#8221;</p>
<p>My conclusion: Forget about CS corporation. Let&#8217;s save the idea. Which includes to think about the danger of creating networks connecting only similar people. Curiousity and openess has to be redefined and eked out everyday, that&#8217;s not a task for machines. At least if you want something else than clones of yourself.</p>
<p>Good night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/17/hospitality-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

