<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OpenCouchSurfing.org &#187; california</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/tag/california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org</link>
	<description>The campaign for a truly open CouchSurfing organisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:04:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California Supreme Court rejects noncompete clauses</title>
		<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2008/08/09/california-supreme-court-rejects-noncompete-clauses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2008/08/09/california-supreme-court-rejects-noncompete-clauses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kasper Souren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for all CouchSurfing volunteers who signed the non-disclosure agreement: the California Supreme Court rejects noncompete clauses.  Since it seems as if the organization has moved on to San Francisco it would be even harder to enforce anyone breaking the non-compete clause, although Matt Whatley seems to have been aware of issues with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for all CouchSurfing volunteers who signed the non-disclosure agreement: the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/07/BAUH12716R.DTL&amp;tsp=1 ">California Supreme Court rejects noncompete clauses</a>.  Since it seems as if the organization has moved on to San Francisco it would be even harder to enforce anyone breaking the non-compete clause, although Matt Whatley seems to have been <a href="http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/wiki/Proposed_NDA_Version_1#Clause_4.2C_Section_1">aware of issues with the non-compete clause in California</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2008/08/09/california-supreme-court-rejects-noncompete-clauses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
