Good news for all CouchSurfing volunteers who signed the non-disclosure agreement: the California Supreme Court rejects noncompete clauses. Since it seems as if the organization has moved on to San Francisco it would be even harder to enforce anyone breaking the non-compete clause, although Matt Whatley seems to have been aware of issues with the non-compete clause in California.
Recent Blog Posts
Recent Comments
- Dagny Ditzel on Casey Fenton needs to go.
- Michael North east on Pickwick: Difference between non-profit and charity
- reader on Is CouchSurfing sustainable???
- Amused on where’s the org chart, on CS?
- Chris on Is CouchSurfing sustainable???
Categories
Monthly Archives
Tags
501c3
Anu
BeWelcome
brainstorm
casey
Casey Fenton
Collective
Communication
community
corporation
couchsurfing
CouchSurfing.com
CouchSurfing Wiki
crash
Democracy
donate
donation
Finances
haters
history
Hospitality-Exchange
hospitality_exchange
Jim Stone
Kasper
leadership
Leadership Circle
leadership_team
legal
money
NDA
News
OpenCouchSurfing
Open Source
participate
Participation
pickwick
thailand
Transparency
Uncategorized
veit
verification
volunteer
volunteering
volunteers
wiki

0 Response to “California Supreme Court rejects noncompete clauses”