<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 501(c)(3)? Can Casey sell out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/</link>
	<description>The campaign for a truly open CouchSurfing organisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niels Smit</title>
		<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Smit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Because a façade it is, as long as an irrevocable asset lock-in clause is NOT included in CS’s byelaws…

Forgot the &#039;not&#039;; makes for rather confusing reading without it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because a façade it is, as long as an irrevocable asset lock-in clause is NOT included in CS’s byelaws…</p>
<p>Forgot the &#8216;not&#8217;; makes for rather confusing reading without it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels Smit</title>
		<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Smit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/#comment-863</guid>
		<description>http://www.couchsurfing.com/group_read.html?gid=429&amp;post=330266#post362967

As Zakor points out here, the attitude of the LT (represented in this thread by Jim whom I have been unable to catch saying anything legally relevant on the 501c3 matter) only adds to the discomfort that is eating some of us.

I started out from the same position as Norbert; it is not because we don&#039;t trust you, it is because we want to ensure that nothing unforeseen can spoil the fun of 227,000 CS users.

But, I am beginning to have serious doubts about Casey&#039;s integrity on this issue. Sure, I believe Jim that there is no intention to sell CouchSurfing.com anytime soon; but will Casey still be passionate about it in, say, ten years from now? And if he isn&#039;t, what but his word (not given by himself, by the way; it is only REPORTEDLY his word) do we have that CS is not to be sold? Exactly, NOTHING AT ALL.

I see an LT that is unable to respond in any satisfactory way to questions raised by a member with relevant legal training; is that really because they don&#039;t want to rush things? I was willing to accept this, if it hadn&#039;t been for the complete lack of demonstrable progress in the application procedure for tax-exempt status. Apparently, they&#039;re simply not willing to proceed at all.

I also see an LT that is &#039;not amused&#039; to find out that users are able to shoot holes in the charitable façade they had so carefully been erecting for CS. Because a façade it is, as long as an irrevocable asset lock-in clause is included in CS&#039;s byelaws...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.couchsurfing.com/group_read.html?gid=429&amp;post=330266#post362967" rel="nofollow">http://www.couchsurfing.com/group_read.html?gid=429&amp;post=330266#post362967</a></p>
<p>As Zakor points out here, the attitude of the LT (represented in this thread by Jim whom I have been unable to catch saying anything legally relevant on the 501c3 matter) only adds to the discomfort that is eating some of us.</p>
<p>I started out from the same position as Norbert; it is not because we don&#8217;t trust you, it is because we want to ensure that nothing unforeseen can spoil the fun of 227,000 CS users.</p>
<p>But, I am beginning to have serious doubts about Casey&#8217;s integrity on this issue. Sure, I believe Jim that there is no intention to sell CouchSurfing.com anytime soon; but will Casey still be passionate about it in, say, ten years from now? And if he isn&#8217;t, what but his word (not given by himself, by the way; it is only REPORTEDLY his word) do we have that CS is not to be sold? Exactly, NOTHING AT ALL.</p>
<p>I see an LT that is unable to respond in any satisfactory way to questions raised by a member with relevant legal training; is that really because they don&#8217;t want to rush things? I was willing to accept this, if it hadn&#8217;t been for the complete lack of demonstrable progress in the application procedure for tax-exempt status. Apparently, they&#8217;re simply not willing to proceed at all.</p>
<p>I also see an LT that is &#8216;not amused&#8217; to find out that users are able to shoot holes in the charitable façade they had so carefully been erecting for CS. Because a façade it is, as long as an irrevocable asset lock-in clause is included in CS&#8217;s byelaws&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikivoyage at Guaka&#8217;s Life</title>
		<link>http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikivoyage at Guaka&#8217;s Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencouchsurfing.org/2007/08/30/501c3-can-casey-sell-out/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>[...] for a long time now. I was not too worried when Wikitravel was bought by Internet Brands (which has already shown interest in buying CouchSurfing). But I have been annoyed by the lack of database dumps at Wikitravel for a long time now. So I was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for a long time now. I was not too worried when Wikitravel was bought by Internet Brands (which has already shown interest in buying CouchSurfing). But I have been annoyed by the lack of database dumps at Wikitravel for a long time now. So I was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
